At this time of year, most right-minded folks are curled up at home or on a beach with a good book, so news pickings are slimmer than a model's legs.

The standard journalistic ruse is to create 'best of' lists to fill the gap. And when you think about it, they fulfil a similar function to literary awards.

US journalist J Peder Zane has some interesting points to make on the subject:

"Like all journalists, I have prizes on my mind. December is when we prepare contest entries for our own work and compile the infamous 'Top 10' lists - of the best records, DVDs, films, books, gag gifts - that fill our pages during the holiday seasons. And when we aren't seeking or bestowing honors, we write columns decrying this awards mania. It is a busy time."

Zane's most thought-provoking point, however, is buried deeper in the article:

"With choice comes responsibility. Which songs? Which programs? Which publications? It can make your head ache. In The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less (2004) Barry Schwartz, a professor of psychology at Swarthmore College, argues that our cornucopia culture is damaging our mental health.

"Perhaps. But that ship has sailed - the future will only bring more choice. In this context, prizes and top 10 lists are cheap forms of mass therapy, reducing the stress of selection. Consider them cultural Prozac."

Zane comes out in favour of lists and prizes, saying "they reflect a vibrant culture full of choice and liberated consumers seeking guidance". That may be so - but they're also a reminder of the increasing amount of decision-making we all have to do on an hourly basis, whether it's composing an answer to an email or deciding which brand of soap to buy.

Now - shall I have have a glass of the Gisborne Gewürztraminer, or the Huapai Pinot Gris?